Love is the Way of Being

Erich Fromm’s quote from The Art of Loving is a powerful critique of how many people misunderstand the nature of love. Let’s break it down line by line to reveal its deeper meaning:


“Love is not primarily a relationship to a specific person; it is an attitude, an orientation of character which determines the relatedness of a person to the world as a whole…”

What this means:

  • Love is not just an emotional connection to one person (like a romantic partner, child, or friend).
  • Instead, Fromm argues that love is a way of being—a stable part of your character or soul.
  • It is an attitude, a disposition, a way of relating to the world that affects everything and everyone you come into contact with.

Implications:

  • If you are a truly loving person, it shows up everywhere: in how you treat strangers, how you engage with nature, how you think about humanity, how you serve.
  • It’s not selective or conditional—it radiates outward from your core, not just inward toward a few.

“…not toward one ‘object’ of love.”

What this means:

  • Fromm criticizes the idea that love is about one person being the object of affection or passion.
  • That perspective treats love as a possession or transaction“I love you, therefore I invest in you and no one else.”

Problem:

  • This view limits love to a single connection rather than a universal virtue.
  • It leads to possessiveness, dependency, and obsession, rather than growth, service, and freedom.

“If a person loves only one other person and is indifferent to the rest of his fellow men, his love is not love but a symbiotic attachment, or an enlarged egotism.”

What this means:

  • A person who says they “love” one person but are cold, cruel, or indifferent to others is not truly loving.
  • What they experience is likely dependency or emotional neediness, not the selfless, outward-reaching quality of true love.
  • Fromm calls this a symbiotic attachment—two people relying on each other not out of fullness, but out of lack or fear.
  • Or, it’s just “enlarged egotism”: loving someone because they reflect your own desires, serve your ego, or make you feel complete.

Think of this like:

  • “I love you because of how you make me feel, not because of who you are.”
  • That’s ego-driven, not love-driven.

“Yet, most people believe that love is constituted by the object, not by the faculty.”

What this means:

  • People wrongly think love is about finding the right person—the right “object” to pour love into.
  • But Fromm teaches that love is a skill, a capacity, a virtue—not something you find, but something you cultivate.

In other words:

  • A truly loving person can love deeply in any relationship, because love is part of their character, not their circumstances.
  • If you don’t know how to love generally, you won’t suddenly know how to love someone just because they’re “special.”

Final Summary:

Fromm is telling us:

  • Love is not a feeling for one person—it’s a way of living.
  • It’s not about who you love, but about how you love.
  • If you only love one person but treat others poorly, what you have isn’t love—it’s need, ego, or attachment.
  • Real love is universal and rooted in your being, not in your attachments.
  • It is nurtured by practice, discipline, and self-transcendence.

Application Questions:

  • Do I treat love like a virtue or like a possession?
  • Can I extend love and compassion to people I don’t “owe” it to?
  • What does my treatment of strangers say about my capacity to love?

Share:

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Email List

Get Iron County News alerts and updates in your inbox!