The question of who truly represents Israel today requires us to examine biblical covenant identity, modern political constructs, and the crucial distinction between the spiritual House of Israel and the modern nation-state called “Israel.” Let’s explore this carefully and thoroughly.
Biblical Israel: A Nation of 12 Tribes, Not Just Judah
The original House of Israel was composed of 12 tribes, descended from the 12 sons of Jacob (Israel):
Reuben
Simeon
Levi
Judah
Dan
Naphtali
Gad
Asher
Issachar
Zebulun
Joseph (divided into Ephraim & Manasseh)
Benjamin
In biblical history:
The 12 tribes formed the united kingdom under David and Solomon.
After Solomon’s reign, the kingdom split:
The Northern Kingdom (Israel): 10 tribes (sometimes called Ephraim)
The Southern Kingdom (Judah): Judah, Benjamin, and parts of Levi
The Northern Kingdom was scattered by Assyria (~722 BC) and became the “Lost Ten Tribes.”
Therefore, modern “Judaism” represents largely Judah (and possibly some of Benjamin and Levi)—not the full 12-tribe covenant body.
The 1948 Nation-State of Israel: Political, Not Prophetic Fulfillment
The modern State of Israel, founded in 1948:
Was established primarily through Zionist political movements, backed by Western imperial support (especially Britain and the U.S.).
Its early population was overwhelmingly Ashkenazi Jewish, later joined by Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews.
Its political and religious identity is Judah-centric, not a full reassembly of the 12 tribes.
Even most Israeli scholars and rabbis admit:
The modern State of Israel is not the restoration of all 12 tribes—nor does it claim to be in covenant fulfillment of the full House of Israel.
This undermines the claim made by many modern Christians that “prophecy was fulfilled in 1948.”
America as a Composite House of Israel?
This is a controversial but compelling idea proposed by some biblical scholars, theologians, and patriotic historians. Here’s how it unfolds:
Arguments for America as a Composite House of Israel:
Ethnic Mixing: The U.S. population is composed of many northern European nations, which historically were believed (in some traditions) to descend from the Lost Tribes (especially Ephraim and Manasseh).
Spiritual Covenant Identity: America’s founding had clear biblical overtones—a “city on a hill,” a new covenant land, referencing Moses, Israel, and divine destiny.
Freedom of Worship, Law, and Conscience: The Constitution and early American ideals mirror Torah principles of law, liberty, justice, and self-governance under God.
Blessings of Joseph: In Genesis 49 and Deuteronomy 33, Joseph’s descendants (Ephraim and Manasseh) are promised:
Great national wealth
Spreading influence
Military strength
Agricultural and natural abundance
Some argue:
Britain = Ephraim (Commonwealth)
America = Manasseh (Mighty nation)
Gathering of Many Tribes and Peoples: America became a melting pot—potentially gathering scattered remnants of multiple tribes who lost their identity.
Protection and Evangelism: The U.S. became the chief global exporter of scripture, spiritual revival, missionary work, and aid—echoing the role of Joseph as a preserver of life (Genesis 45:5).
What Does This Mean Prophetically and Practically?
1. Zion ≠ Modern Israel
True Zion is not a flag or government, but a people of covenant, built on truth, righteousness, and obedience to God’s law. Modern Israel (1948) may fulfill geopolitical prophecy, but not the full spiritual restoration of Israel.
2. The Two Houses Must Be Reunited
“And I will take the stick of Joseph… and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah… and they shall be one in mine hand.” — Ezekiel 37:19
The House of Judah (Jews) and the House of Israel (lost tribes) must be reunited in righteousness. That has not happened yet.
3. America at a Crossroads
If America is a composite House of Israel, it is currently:
In a phase of moral collapse
Under judgment and scattering
Betraying its covenant roots
Being overtaken by the Babylonian financial-military empire it once resisted
It is now facing the same fate as ancient Israel: divided, corrupted, and warned by prophets it will not hear.
“War is a racket.” — Major General Smedley Butler (USMC)
Integration into Frame of Reference:
This ties directly to Tytler’s Cycle: moving people from freedom → dependence → bondage.
It also reveals how financial empires function as modern Babylon: controlling nations through debt, division, and distraction.
The public becomes strangers in their own land, unaware that the same elites who call for “freedom” are the ones fueling the fire.
This insight strikes at the core of the moral ambiguity deliberately engineered and exploited by financial elites and geopolitical power brokers—those who profit most when truth is blurred and sides are manipulated.
“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”
This quote reveals a powerful truth: moral labels like “terrorist” or “freedom fighter” are often subjective, politically convenient, and manipulated—especially by those who fund, arm, or label both sides to control the outcome.
Weaponized Labels: Who Controls the Narrative?
Same Tactics — Different Labels:
A rebel fighting foreign occupation is called a freedom fighter by some.
The same rebel, when opposing Western or allied interests, is called a terrorist.
Examples:
Osama bin Laden: Funded by the U.S. during the Soviet-Afghan War → Later labeled the world’s most wanted terrorist.
Hamas: Viewed as a resistance movement by some Arabs → Labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S. and Israel.
Ukrainian paramilitaries: Framed as heroes by NATO powers → Framed as extremists by Russia.
Founders of the U.S.: To the British, Washington and Jefferson were insurgents and traitors.
The label depends on who’s writing the history—and who’s funding the war.
Funding Both Sides = Profiting from Confusion
When international bankers and arms dealers fund:
Israel and Iran
Allies and Axis
Ukraine and Russia (via indirect economic ties)
Governments and the rebels they suppress
They thrive in gray zones, where definitions are fluid, public opinion is shaped by fear, and morality becomes a chess piece, not a compass.
This allows the elite to:
Justify military buildup
Restructure debt arrangements
Control oil, tech, or strategic resources
Divide nations by ideology, then sell both sides the tools of war
“Confusion is the ally of control. When people are too divided to define evil, they are too paralyzed to resist it.”
Tapestry Connection
This quote reveals the collapse of objective moral standards, as warned by C.S. Lewis in The Abolition of Man.
It fits into Tytler’s Cycle, especially in the shift from apathy to dependence: when moral clarity is lost, power fills the void.
It exposes the Overton Window at work: redefining “freedom” and “terror” as politically expedient categories.
It reflects Stage 4 stagnation in Kohlberg’s theory, where obedience to authority replaces conscience.
These statements from Joe Biden are profoundly revealing when understood through the lens of how global conflicts are bankrolled on both sides—serving the long-standing agenda of international financiers to centralize control over sovereign nations.
“Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region.” — Joe Biden, 1986 (reaffirmed 2023)
This is not just political rhetoric. It’s a geopolitical admission.
What Does This Quote Really Mean?
Biden implies:
Israel is not just a sovereign ally, but an instrument of American power in the Middle East.
If it didn’t exist organically, it would have to be created artificially—because it serves strategic control interests.
Therefore, Israel is not just a nation, but a geopolitical project—a tool within a larger imperial framework.
This aligns with the pattern of international powers planting and maintaining proxy states to enforce their economic and military interests globally.
Israel as a Strategic Outpost of the International Order
Israel, since its founding in 1948, has received:
$150+ billion in U.S. foreign aid (largest recipient historically)
Military superiority, tech dominance, and constant diplomatic protection
Access to Western capital markets, intelligence platforms, and political cover
In return, Israel provides:
A launchpad for Western intelligence and military operations
A buffer to counterbalance Arab nationalism, Iranian influence, or independent oil regimes
A destabilizing force (when needed) to justify arms sales, alliances, or interventions
It’s a client state—strategically vital not because of shared values, but because of its utility in controlling the region.
Bankrolling Both Sides: The Deeper Strategy
Step-by-Step Breakdown:
Support Israel with money, weapons, and tech.
Secretly or tacitly fund regional opposition:
Iran under Shah (1950s–1979)
Iran via hostage releases and unfreezing assets
Hamas (originally allowed to counterbalance Arafat’s PLO)
Hezbollah indirectly through financial systems
Allow conflict to escalate:
Ensure permanent instability.
Justify increased arms sales.
Enslave both sides through debt, aid dependency, or energy scarcity.
Use international banks (e.g., BIS, IMF, Federal Reserve networks) to:
Finance reconstruction
Restructure economies
Enforce global financial compliance (SWIFT, sanctions, reserve currencies)
This is controlled chaos by design.
The Central Bankers’ Game: Control Through Contradiction
Like the Rothschilds during the Napoleonic Wars, modern financiers and oligarchs:
Fund both Zionist and Arab regimes
Sell weapons to both Israel and U.S.-armed Gulf states
Control the global messaging (via media, universities, think tanks)
Funnel all outcomes—whether “win” or “loss”—into greater consolidation of power
Every conflict becomes:
A business opportunity
A debt trap
A moral fog
A psychological war on the population
Integration into the Full Tapestry
This ties directly into:
Tytler’s Cycle: nations move from abundance to dependence under the illusion of safety.
Kohlberg’s Stage 4 moral stagnation: citizens follow laws and flags without asking deeper questions.
Overton Window manipulation: support for Israel becomes unquestionable, while criticism is reframed as hate.
“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”: narratives are shaped by financiers, not facts.
Babylon vs. Zion: a system built on debt, idolatry, and engineered conflict cloaks itself in righteousness.
Additional Thought
“If Israel didn’t exist, we’d have to invent it.” That’s not a celebration of friendship—it’s a confession of geostrategic puppetry.
When nations are invented to serve financial and imperial interests, their existence is no longer rooted in sovereignty—it becomes performance art in a theater of permanent war.
The result? Nations trapped in bondage. Populations manipulated through false moral binaries. And central bankers—who fund both sides—controlling the outcome no matter who “wins.”
The creation of Israel in 1948 mirrors a centuries-old empire-building tactic: establishing permanent outposts or proxy nations under moral, religious, or humanitarian pretenses, but ultimately to serve strategic expansion, control, and resource access.
Here is a detailed breakdown of how the State of Israel functions similarly to a frontier fort, military base, or lily pad—serving the modern imperial ambitions of the U.S. and its international financial backers.
The Fort Analogy: Israel as the Outpost of Empire
Throughout history, empires have planted forts or settlements:
To secure military presence
To control strategic lands and trade routes
To project power into hostile or resource-rich territories
In the American Indian Wars, U.S. forts were:
Built on occupied lands
Used to displace natives, enforce laws, and protect settler interests
Established to expand the frontier, not co-exist peacefully
Always defended as necessary for peace and protection—even as they enforced domination
This same pattern reemerged in the 20th century with Israel’s creation—now under U.S. and international finance instead of cavalry and cannons.
Israel as a Strategic Military Fort and Proxy State
Location:
Situated in the center of the Arab world, bordering Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and close to Iran.
Positioned to monitor oil routes, shipping lanes, and regional movements.
A launchpad for airstrikes, intelligence gathering, cyber warfare, and covert operations.
Function:
Not merely a Jewish refuge (though that was the moral cover), but a geopolitical spearhead:
Serves U.S. and Western military-industrial interests
Controls a region rich in oil, gas, ideology, and instability
Enables U.S. and NATO influence without deploying permanent ground troops
Subsidized Expansion:
Israel is the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign aid—more than $150 billion.
Receives cutting-edge military tech, diplomatic protection, and economic support.
Unlike other U.S. military bases, it’s a sovereign state with full military autonomy—but aligned with U.S. and international elite interests.
Global Strategy: The Lily Pad Doctrine
In U.S. military strategy, “Lily Pads” are:
Small, strategically located bases or partner nations used to:
Project power quickly
Avoid costly permanent deployments
Circumvent domestic and international resistance to war
Israel functions as a Lily Pad:
Hosts joint exercises, intelligence sharing, and R&D for U.S. tech companies
Coordinates covert operations in Syria, Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza
Allows U.S. influence to persist in a region where direct military presence would be politically explosive
Moral Cover + Manufactured Consent
Like forts in the American Indian Wars, Israel’s creation was framed as:
A moral imperative (to protect Jews post-Holocaust)
A religious return (Zionism)
A defensive necessity (surrounded by enemies)
But beneath that was:
The displacement of native populations (Palestinians)
A proxy war zone to test weapons and justify defense budgets
A foot in the door for Western control of Middle East politics, oil, and finance
Just as the U.S. used “Manifest Destiny” to justify expansion, Israel’s existence was supported through a modern equivalent: Democratic Exceptionalism + Biblical Prophecy + Perpetual Threat.
Empire by Other Means: Bankers, Not Bayonets
In today’s version of empire:
Central banks, arms dealers, and global corporations replace armies and flags.
Nations like Israel become frontier installations of financial, technological, and ideological dominance.
The goal isn’t just land—it’s control of supply chains, populations, resources, and information.
The “American empire” is more accurately the Western globalist financial empire, and Israel is its most strategic fortress in the Middle East.
Integration Into Your Framework
This ties directly into:
Tytler’s Cycle: perpetual wars justify loss of liberty and increase in central control.
The Overton Window: critics of Israel are rebranded as antisemites to suppress dissent.
Prophetic narrative manipulation: Zionism is weaponized to serve secular and imperial ends.
“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”: Palestinian resistance is morally flattened, while Israeli military action is sanctified.
Additional Word
Israel is not merely a nation—it is a modern-day fort, planted in prophetic disguise, funded by empire, and used to project control.
It was “invented,” as Biden admits—not only as a homeland for Jews, but as a geostrategic foothold.
Just as forts displaced native Americans under the guise of “peace,” Israel functions similarly in the Middle East—enforcing Western dominance through calculated presence and perpetual instability.
The idea that the United States is the “Great Satan” and Israel is the “Little Satan” is not just ideological rhetoric from Iran or Islamist groups—it is, when analyzed through historical, economic, and prophetic frameworks, a reflection of how the U.S. functions as the enforcer of a global empire driven by finance, debt, and control, while Israel operates as its forward operating base (or proxy fort).
Let’s unpack this in full detail.
“Great Satan” and “Little Satan”: Where Did the Terms Come From?
These terms originated after the 1979 Iranian Revolution:
“Great Satan”: Coined by Ayatollah Khomeini, referring to America as the root of moral corruption, imperialism, and economic domination.
“Little Satan”: Refers to Israel, seen as the outpost of U.S. and Zionist power in the Islamic world.
To most Western ears, these are dismissed as “radical Islamic slogans.” But from a geopolitical and historical lens, they contain more truth than propaganda.
The United States as the Face of International Bankers
Thomas Jefferson warned:
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.”
“Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.”
From the 20th century onward, the U.S. became the vehicle for:
Wall Street banking interests
The Federal Reserve System (privately controlled central bank)
The IMF, World Bank, and BIS
Dollar hegemony: forcing global trade (especially oil) to be settled in USD
Global surveillance, military enforcement, and regime control
In essence, the U.S. became the armored suit worn by the invisible global banking elite—projecting military and financial power under the brand of democracy and freedom.
Israel as “Little Satan”: The Outpost of the Western Financial Empire
As detailed in the article “The Modern Fort,” Israel functions as:
A militarized outpost in a hostile region
A recipient of $150+ billion in U.S. aid
A buffer against regional autonomy (e.g., Syria, Iran, Hezbollah)
A tech, cyber, and surveillance hub integrated with the U.S. military-industrial complex
In this view:
Israel serves the empire’s interests, not just its own survival.
It provides cover for globalist interventions in the Middle East.
It justifies perpetual war, which enriches banks, arms dealers, and control systems.
The Spiritual View: Babylon, Satan, and the False Light
In biblical and prophetic language:
Babylon is a system of deception, commerce, idolatry, and bloodshed, masked as righteousness.
Satan in scripture is not just a horned figure—but the father of lies, merchant of nations, and accuser of truth.
Revelation 18 describes Babylon:
“For all the nations have drunk the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth have grown rich from her excessive luxuries.”
The U.S., as the most powerful arm of global commerce, cultural manipulation, military intervention, and propaganda, resembles this prophetic Babylon.
Israel, as its protected gatekeeper in the Middle East, becomes the “little proxy” enforcing Babylon’s reach over sacred lands.
So when Iran or others call the U.S. the “Great Satan,” it may not be holy, but it is spiritually descriptive.
What This Looks Like in Action
Systemic Element
United States (“Great Satan”)
Israel (“Little Satan”)
Military Enforcement
800+ bases worldwide
Controls Gaza, West Bank, strikes Syria/Iran
Financial Control
IMF, World Bank, Fed, Dollar supremacy
Tied to U.S. finance, tech, military aid
Cultural Engineering
Hollywood, Big Tech, LGBTQ+ export
Anchored in Western values despite regional tension
Perpetual War Justification
“War on Terror,” “Democracy”
Framed as defensive, but projects offense
Prophetic Manipulation
“Christian Zionism,” End Times profiteering
Claim to biblical heritage for geopolitical ends
The Real War: Truth vs. Deception, Not East vs. West
This isn’t about choosing between:
America vs. Iran
Israel vs. Palestine
It’s about recognizing a pattern of manipulation—where elites manufacture war, fund both sides, and use religion, nationhood, and identity as tools to divide and enslave humanity.
The U.S. and Israel—when hijacked by financial and ideological empires—become extensions of Babylon, not Zion.
The Great Satan is the system of deception, economic tyranny, and perpetual war that wears the American flag like a cloak of righteousness.
The Little Satan is the proxy that makes the cloak work in hard-to-reach places.
Final Thought
“If you want to know who rules over you, find out who you’re not allowed to criticize.” — Voltaire (attributed)
Understanding why the U.S. is called the Great Satan and Israel the Little Satan doesn’t require you to side with their enemies—it requires you to see the system of control that uses even the best intentions for global enslavement.
Iron County News is a grassroots volunteer newspaper. It subsists on the monetary and working donations of private citizens and journalists who feel that real news needs to come to the forefront of mainstream news practices.
If you’re interested in writing for the Iron County News, or contributing in other ways, please contact us.
