Subtitle: How a violent resistance group was quietly nurtured by state power to divide a people, justify war, and manipulate public opinion
Introduction
Most people assume that Hamas emerged organically—out of righteous resistance or radical fervor. But the truth is far more engineered, entangled in a long history of proxy manipulation, financial opportunism, and ideological gamesmanship. When we follow the money and trace the incentives, a disturbing picture emerges: Hamas was not merely tolerated by Israel and the West—it was functionally cultivated to serve a much larger agenda.
This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a pattern, visible through documented history, consistent with the Hegelian Dialectic, and aligned with how empires manufacture enemies to justify authoritarian control. Let’s expose how.
Origins of Hamas: The Useful Offshoot
Hamas was founded in 1987 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, during the First Intifada. While its founding ideology focused on Islamic resistance to the occupation of Palestine, its rise to power was not a result of sheer ideological momentum alone.
Key fact: Hamas’s social service programs in Gaza were initially encouraged and left undisturbed by Israeli authorities, because they were seen as a counterbalance to the secular, nationalist Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) under Yasser Arafat.
This strategic toleration is confirmed by:
- Former Israeli Brig. Gen. Yitzhak Segev, who admitted funding Hamas-linked organizations to weaken the PLO.
- U.S. intelligence observers, who quietly acknowledged the parallel to how the CIA funded the Mujahideen in Afghanistan.
Result? A divided Palestinian movement—precisely what Israel’s deep state wanted.
Divide and Conquer: A Classic Dialectic Strategy
This is a textbook use of the Hegelian Dialectic:
- Thesis: Secular Palestinian nationalism (PLO)
- Antithesis: Islamist resistance (Hamas)
- Synthesis: Fractured resistance, endless conflict, and justification for occupation
By enabling Hamas, Israel (with tacit U.S. approval) created an internal enemy within the Palestinian territories. This “enemy” became the excuse for:
- Avoiding peace talks
- Accelerating settlements
- Enacting sweeping crackdowns under the guise of national security
Was the CIA Involved? What About the Rockefellers?
There is no smoking-gun evidence of CIA funding for Hamas. However, the pattern of behavior fits what the CIA has done globally for decades:
- Back radical groups to destroy secular governments (see: Iran, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan)
- Sow chaos to justify military buildup and foreign intervention
As for Rockefeller involvement, there’s no direct link. But the ideology behind their globalist agenda—which prioritizes controlled conflict, centralized power, and engineered crises—aligns perfectly with how Hamas has been used.
Bottom line: Whether through NGOs, Gulf state “charities,” or unspoken toleration, the machinery of empire fostered Hamas not as a mistake—but as a strategic tool.
Overton Window Engineering
By promoting and then demonizing Hamas, the Israeli and Western governments shifted the Overton Window:
- Once-radical ideas (indiscriminate bombing, mass civilian displacement, surveillance of Arabs) become acceptable.
- Palestinian advocacy becomes suspect, “terror-linked,” or antisemitic.
- The media focuses entirely on Hamas rockets—ignoring decades of settler expansion, home demolitions, and apartheid conditions.
This shift created an emotional narrative, where:
- Israel = Western values, democracy, victim
- Palestinians = chaos, religious fanaticism, terrorists
Even peaceful Palestinian voices get drowned out in this binary noise.
“Problem–Reaction–Solution”: The Empire’s Favorite Trick
What happened with Hamas follows the global elite’s favorite psychological tactic:
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| Problem | Allow a radical group (Hamas) to grow |
| Reaction | Media amplifies terror; public demands protection |
| Solution | Military-industrial expansion, foreign aid to Israel, suppression of dissent, and surveillance justification |
Just as 9/11 enabled the Patriot Act, Hamas enables endless war, moral panic, and narrative control.
Who Benefits?
Let’s follow the money and influence:
- U.S. weapons manufacturers benefit from billions in military aid to Israel.
- Israeli politicians consolidate power by pointing to a constant external threat.
- Western intelligence agencies justify surveillance infrastructure and domestic crackdowns.
- Gulf elites use Hamas as a foil to deflect from their own tyranny.
And the victims? Everyday Palestinians—and Jews of conscience—who get caught in a manufactured war that neither side truly controls.
Final Thoughts: Manufactured Chaos, Real Suffering
The story of Hamas isn’t simple. But it’s not as spontaneous or organic as the mainstream narrative pretends. Its rise was encouraged, manipulated, and ultimately weaponized.
Like the Mujahideen, ISIS, and even the original Soviet regime, Hamas is a product of geopolitical puppet-mastery, meant to:
- Divide nations,
- Distract publics,
- Justify control,
- And destroy any hope of lasting peace or sovereignty.
If we are ever to escape this cycle, we must stop playing into the false binaries, and start exposing the puppetmasters behind the conflict.
