As of February 9, 2025, President Donald Trump’s administration has undertaken several actions aimed at dismantling or significantly altering various federal programs and policies:
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs: The administration has eliminated DEI initiatives within federal agencies, labeling them as discriminatory. This move has led to the removal of such programs and placed numerous Black and Brown federal employees on paid administrative leave.
Environmental Justice Considerations: The Trump administration repealed a Clinton-era mandate that integrated environmental justice into federal decision-making processes. President Trump argued that these policies violated federal civil rights laws and undermined traditional American values.
Education Department: Plans are underway to dismantle the Department of Education. Critics, including Senator Tammy Baldwin, have expressed concerns about the potential loss of significant funding for states, with Wisconsin having received $630 million from the department last year.
Federal Workforce Reduction: In collaboration with Elon Musk, the administration is executing plans to significantly reduce the federal workforce and dismantle key agencies, including the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This move threatens to disrupt global food aid, refugee assistance, and vaccination programs.
Regulatory Changes: The administration has initiated a series of executive orders aimed at reshaping government operations. These include withdrawing from international agreements, imposing trade tariffs, and proposing controversial policies such as taking control of Gaza for redevelopment.
These actions reflect the administration’s broader agenda to restructure federal programs and policies, often reversing initiatives from previous administrations.
Samuel Pisar’s Coexistence & Commerce: Guidelines for Transactions Between East and West was written during the Cold War as a blueprint for economic engagement between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. His vision promoted economic interdependence as a means to avoid conflict, using commerce to integrate opposing systems rather than relying on war or ideological battles.
However, linking this to Trump, Musk, Agenda 2030, and the Mark of the Beast requires deeper analysis:
Samuel Pisar’s Vision: Coexistence Through Trade
- Pisar argued that economic integration could be a tool for geopolitical stability, discouraging conflict between superpowers by binding their economies together.
- This foreshadowed globalization, where corporations and technology drive world governance rather than just national governments.
- His approach influenced later free trade agreements and China’s rise through U.S.-led economic cooperation, eventually leading to today’s interdependent world.
Trump, Musk, and Global Economic Realignment
- Trump’s administration was anti-globalist in rhetoric but still engaged in economic nationalism (e.g., trade wars with China, NAFTA renegotiation). However, his policies did not break financial ties but rather restructured them in America’s favor.
- Musk’s role in technology, AI, space, and finance (Tesla, Starlink, Neuralink, X/Twitter, cryptocurrency) positions him as a key player in shaping the global digital economy.
- Despite their differences, both Trump and Musk align with economic nationalism while still embracing technological globalization, leading to questions about whether they are playing into the same larger system.
2030: “You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy” (World Economic Forum Vision)
- The WEF’s “Great Reset” agenda, particularly Klaus Schwab’s vision for stakeholder capitalism, promotes a world where:
- Traditional property ownership declines (e.g., subscription-based economies, digital currencies, and AI-driven automation).
- Personal assets shift towards collective access (housing, transportation, food services).
- Universal digital identity and financial control expand, raising concerns about mass surveillance and financial restrictions.
- While Trump presents himself as opposing the WEF agenda, his policies did not fundamentally dismantle the global financial system—rather, he restructured alliances (e.g., favoring nationalism over multilateral agreements).
- Musk’s AI and digital finance ambitions (X, Starlink, Neuralink, Tesla AI) put him at the forefront of the same technological transformation that the WEF promotes.
The Mark of the Beast and Digital Control
- The Biblical “Mark of the Beast” (Revelation 13:16-17) describes a system where individuals cannot buy or sell without a centralized identifier.
- Digital ID, CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies), AI-driven surveillance, and social credit systems mirror this prophecy.
- Musk’s Neuralink, X as an “everything app,” and the potential move toward cashless societies indicate that financial transactions are becoming more centralized and controlled.
- Trump, despite opposing digital control in his rhetoric, did not fundamentally halt the movement toward digital financial surveillance.
Is There a Direct Connection?
- Pisar’s vision of economic integration laid the groundwork for modern globalist strategies—it encouraged the U.S. and adversaries to engage economically rather than through war.
- Trump’s economic nationalism may be a controlled opposition strategy—altering but not eliminating globalization.
- Musk’s role in AI, finance, and space expansion aligns with WEF’s technological transformation, whether intentionally or not.
- Agenda 2030 (Great Reset) increasingly resembles a system of financial and digital control that could pave the way for a “Mark of the Beast”-like system.
Conclusion
While Pisar’s Coexistence & Commerce was focused on avoiding Cold War conflicts, it indirectly laid the foundation for the economic structures enabling digital governance today. Trump and Musk may oppose elements of the WEF’s agenda, but their actions still contribute to a larger system of financial and technological centralization.
If the WEF’s “own nothing and be happy” vision materializes, it would not be through direct force but through economic incentives, digital ID systems, and AI-driven infrastructure—making it voluntary in appearance, but restrictive in reality. Whether this ultimately fulfills the prophecy of the Mark of the Beast depends on how these systems evolve and whether they are used for control rather than empowerment.
